Results · No entries
Nothing published here yet.
We have no client results yet. A result needs a baseline and a 90-day re-measurement on the same query set, and none exists, so there is nothing honest to put on this page. When there is, it will appear here in the format below.
Why this page is empty rather than padded
A results page is the easiest page on any agency site to fill dishonestly. Logos of companies that bought a workshop once. Testimonial quotes with no number in them. Projected figures presented in the past tense.
We sell measurement. Padding this page would tell you exactly how much our measurement is worth, so it stays empty until it is not.
The publishing policy
That a company is our client is public, and its name may be published. Publication rights are written into the contract at signature.
Deal specifics stay private: what the client paid, its internal data, its strategy, and anything else the contract protects.
Where a client appears in a table we publish, its row is marked as a client in the table itself, in every edition, permanently. Not in a footnote, and not on a separate disclosure page.
Every entry states its method, so the figures can be argued with whether or not the company is named. A result nobody agreed to publish is a result that quietly never gets published, which is why the rights are settled at signature rather than after the numbers come in. The full rules are in the conflict of interest policy.
Specimen
What every entry will carry
Zeroed template · Not a result · Method v1.1
Result 01
- Category
- CRE underwriting and valuation software
- Engagement
- Retainer, 3 months
- Baseline collected
- 0000-00-00
- Delta collected
- 0000-00-00
- Query set
- 38 category queries, 12 problem queries
- Runs per query
- 3
What we cannot attribute: movement coinciding with an engine update is reported and not claimed.
Recommendation share · Baseline → 90 days
| Engine | Baseline | 90 days |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Claude | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Gemini | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Perplexity | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Google AI Overviews | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Citation share · Baseline → 90 days
| Engine | Baseline | 90 days |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Claude | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Gemini | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Perplexity | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Google AI Overviews | 0.0% | 0.0% |
[ ZEROED TEMPLATE. NOT A RESULT. ]
## Result 01
Category: CRE underwriting and valuation software
Engagement: Retainer, 3 months
Baseline collected: 0000-00-00
Delta collected: 0000-00-00
Query set: 38 category queries, 12 problem queries
Runs per query: 3
Method: v1.1
Engines: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews
Recommendation share, baseline -> 90 days
ChatGPT 0.0% -> 0.0%
Claude 0.0% -> 0.0%
Gemini 0.0% -> 0.0%
Perplexity 0.0% -> 0.0%
Google AI Overviews 0.0% -> 0.0%
Citation share, baseline -> 90 days
ChatGPT 0.0% -> 0.0%
Claude 0.0% -> 0.0%
Gemini 0.0% -> 0.0%
Perplexity 0.0% -> 0.0%
Google AI Overviews 0.0% -> 0.0%
What we cannot attribute:
[ Movement coinciding with an engine update is reported and not claimed. ]Same fields, same order, every time. Including the last one. The format is published before there is anything in it, so it can be checked now rather than trusted later.
| Field | What it states |
|---|---|
| Category | The client's category, not the client |
| Baseline | Recommendation share at the start, per engine |
| Delta | Recommendation share after 90 days, measured identically |
| Citation share | Reported beside it, both measurements, never merged |
| Query set | Size of the set and how it was constructed |
| Engines | Which engines, at how many runs per query |
| Method | Method version that produced both measurements |
| What we did | The work, specifically enough to be argued with |
| What we cannot attribute | Movement we will not claim credit for |
The one result we can publish without permission
martenfield.com runs in the same tracking pipeline we sell, against its own query set, measured from the day the site went live. We expect the early numbers to show we do not appear for most of it. Those get published quarterly, starting from the baseline where we look bad. It is the most credible case study available to a firm with no case studies, and it is the only client whose permission we do not need.
Read the quarterly baseline →